When does imagery require motor resources? A commentary on Bach et al., 2022.

(2024) Psychological research — Vol. 88, n° 6, p. 1817-1819 (2024)

Files

2024_Vannuscorps_Psychol_Res_Ab.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 77.42 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Bach, Frank, and Kunde introduce a hypothesis that encompasses two main claims: (1) motor imagery relies primarily on representations of the perceptual effects of actions, and (2) the engagement of motor resources provides access to the specific timing, kinematic or internal bodily state that characterize an action. In this commentary, I argue that the first claim is compelling and suggest some alternatives to the second one.
Affiliations

Citations

Vannuscorps, G. (2024). When does imagery require motor resources? A commentary on Bach et al., 2022. Psychological research, 88(6), 1817-1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01917-6 (Original work published 2024)