A Heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2019), and Ainley et al. (2019)’s commentaries : Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research
(2020) Biological Psychology — Vol. 152, p. 107869 (2020)
Files
AHeartfeltResponse_F_Preprint.docx
Preprint
Open Access - Microsoft Word XML
- 104.23 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- In two commentaries, Zimprich, Nusser, and Pollatos (2019), and Ainley, Tskaris, Pollatos, Schulz, and Herbert (2019) dispute conclusions raised by Zamariola, Maurage, Luminet, and Corneille (2018) in a large sample study that questioned the validity of IAcc scores derived from the Heartbeat Counting Task (HCT). After clarifying the reliability of our procedures and the robustness of our main findings, we address the four points of contention discussed in the Commentaries. In doing so, we spell out why research using the HCT faces important interpretational issues, and we call for a theoretical clarification on the construct. In our conclusion, we provide recommendations for improving HCT research and research on interoception in general.
- Affiliations
Citations
Corneille, O., Desmedt, O., Zamariola, G., Luminet, O., & Maurage, P. (2020). A Heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2019), and Ainley et al. (2019)’s commentaries : Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research. Biological Psychology, 152, 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107869 (Original work published 2020)