Are Seniority Privileges Unfair?

(2004) Economics and Philosophy — Vol. 20, n° 2, p. 279-305 (2004)

Files

Seniorityprivileges.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 620.59 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
What should maximin egalitarians think about seniority privileges? We contrast a good-specific and an all-things-considered perspective. As to the former, inertia and erasing effects of a seniority-based allocation of benefits fromemploymentareidentified,allowingustospotthecategoriesofworkers and job-seekers made involuntarily worse off by such a practice. What matters however is to find out whether abolishing seniority privileges will bring about a society in which the all-things-considered worst off people are better off than in the seniority rule’s presence. An assessment of the latter’s cost-reduction potential is thus needed, enabling us to bridge a practice taking place within a firm with its impact on who the least well off members of society are likely to be. Three accounts of the profitability of seniority privileges are discussed: the “(firm specific) human capital”, the “deferred compensation” and the “knowledge transfer” ones. The respective relevance of “good-specific” and “all-things-considered” analysis is discussed. It turns out that under certain circumstances, a maximin egalitarian case for seniority privileges could be made. Senior: Do you know that they are planning layoffs? Of course, it is only fair that they lay-off the newcomers first! After all, I have been loyal to the company for many years. Junior: Did I choose to be a newcomer?
Affiliations

Citations

Gosseries, A. (2004). Are Seniority Privileges Unfair? Economics and Philosophy, 20(2), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267104000215 (Original work published 2004)