Quantifying age and model uncertainties in palaeoclimate data and dynamical climate models with a joint inferential analysis

Carson, J.;Crucifix, Michel;Preston, S. P.;Wilkinson, R. D.
(2019) Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences — Vol. 475, n° 2224, p. 20180854 (2019)

Files

180308482.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 726.87 KB
Download

Details

Authors
  • Carson, J.orcid-logo
    Author
  • Crucifix, Michelorcid-logoUCLouvain
    Author
  • Preston, S. P.
    Author
  • Wilkinson, R. D.
    Author
Abstract
A major goal in paleoclimate science is to reconstruct historical climates using proxies for climate variables such as those observed in sediment cores, and in the process learn about climate dynamics. This is hampered by uncertainties in how sediment core depths relate to ages, how proxy quantities relate to climate variables, how climate models are specified, and the values of parameters in climate models. Quantifying these uncertainties is key in drawing well founded conclusions. Analyses are often performed in separate stages with, for example, a sediment core's depth-age relation being estimated as stage one, then fed as an input to calibrate climate models as stage two. Here, we show that such "multi-stage" approaches can lead to misleading conclusions. We develop a joint inferential approach for climate reconstruction, model calibration, and age model estimation. We focus on the glacial-interglacial cycle over the past 780 kyr, analysing two sediment cores that span this range. Our age estimates are largely in agreement with previous studies, but provides the full joint specification of all uncertainties, estimation of model parameters, and the model evidence. By sampling plausible chronologies from the posterior distribution, we demonstrate that downstream scientific conclusions can differ greatly both between different sampled chronologies, and in comparison with conclusions obtained in the complete joint inferential analysis. We conclude that multi-stage analyses are insufficient when dealing with uncertainty, and that to draw sound conclusions the full joint inferential analysis must be performed.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Carson, J., Crucifix, M., Preston, S. P., & Wilkinson, R. D. (2019). Quantifying age and model uncertainties in palaeoclimate data and dynamical climate models with a joint inferential analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475(2224), 20180854. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0854 (Original work published 2019)