Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. "Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis" [Pain 2009;141:215-221], and on Rollman "Perspectives on hypervigilance" [Pain 2009;141:183-184].

Van Damme, Stefaan;Crombez, Geert;Wiech, Katja;Legrain, Valéry;Eccleston, Christopher;et.al.
(2009) PAIN® — Vol. 144, n° 3, p. 342-3; author reply 343-4 (2009)

Files

VanDamme-2009_PAIN_Lett.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 255.46 KB

Details

Authors
  • Van Damme, Stefaan
    Author
  • Crombez, Geert
    Author
  • Wiech, Katja
    Author
  • Author
  • Eccleston, Christopher
    Author
Show more
Affiliations

Citations

Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Wiech, K., Legrain, V., Peters, M. L., & Eccleston, C. (2009). Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. “Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis” [Pain 2009;141:215-221], and on Rollman “Perspectives on hypervigilance” [Pain 2009;141:183-184]. PAIN®, 144(3), 342-3; author reply 343-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.035 (Original work published 2009)