Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases

Eerola, Aleksi;Reuchamps, Min
(2016) Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques — Vol. 77, p. 319-336 (2016)

Files

EerolaAReuchampsMConstitutionalModernisationandDeliberativeDemocracy2016.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 667.94 KB
Download

Details

Authors
Abstract
This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Eerola, A., & Reuchamps, M. (2016). Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, 77, 319-336. https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319 (Original work published 2016)