Generating Democratic Legitimacy through Deliberative Innovations: The Role of Embeddedness and Disruptiveness
(2016) Representation — Vol. 52, n° 1, p. 13-27 (2016)
Files
CaluwaertsDReuchampsMGeneratingDemocraticLegitimacythroughDeliberativeInnovations2016.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 369.37 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- (en) Democratic deliberation is claimed to improve the legitimacy of democratic decision making. However, deliberation’s beneficial effects do not come about easily. If deliberative innovations want to contribute to the legitimacy of political decision making, they have to reflect the principles of legitimacy in their own functioning. In this paper, we set out to assess the input and output legitimacy of four deliberative events, and determine which are the favourable conditions for their legitimacy. Based on a comparison of the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, the Belgian G1000, the Dutch Burgerforum, and the Irish We The Citizens, we argue that the institutional embeddedness of deliberative innovations strongly affect their claims to legitimacy, but also that their disruptive potential is unrelated to legitimacy.
- Affiliations
Citations
Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2016). Generating Democratic Legitimacy through Deliberative Innovations: The Role of Embeddedness and Disruptiveness. Representation, 52(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2016.1244111 (Original work published 2016)