This case study discusses a systematic review of published ethnographic records retrieved
from the electronic Human Relations Area Files (eHRAF) World Cultures. The review
formed part of my PhD project that dealt with the question why people deliberate. Relying on
evolutionary psychology, I hypothesised that people share an evolved psychological
mechanism that triggers deliberation upon the detection of specific environmental inputs (i.e.
ingroup political disagreement). The underlying premise was that deliberation formed the
default way to deal with ingroup political disagreement among our ancient ancestors who
lived as (semi-)nomadic hunter-gatherers. To probe the plausibility of this premise, I
conducted a systematic review of ethnographic records available through eHRAF to study
how people in historically-documented (semi-)nomadic hunter-gatherer cultures dealt with
political disagreements. In this case study, readers will learn how to set up and execute such
a review –from getting to know the eHRAF environment and formulating a reproducible
search query to the systematic selection of a (manageable) sample of records and the coding
and analysis of selected records. Readers will also learn about key limitations, most notably
that it may be difficult to (quantitatively) test (situational) hypotheses about political
behaviour using published ethnographic records retrieved through eHRAF. Finally, readers
will learn how to verify the quality of the data produced through such a systematic review
and come to know how they can deal with missing data issues.
van der Does, R. (2026). Deliberation in Hunter-gatherer Cultures: A Systematic Review of the Ethnographic Record Using the Electronic Human Relations Area Files (eHRAF). Sage Research Methods, XX, XX. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/280545 (Original work published 2026)