The business case versus the moral case for flexible working arrangements
(2025) A Research Agenda for Flexible Working Arrangements — ISBN: [9781035317622], 139-154, published
Files
Taskin 2025 Business case Moral cas flexible work_Chapter_DeMenezesKelliher_2025.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 315.31 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- From a business standpoint, flexible work arrangements appear-in the short term-to be bearing fruit for employers and employees alike. These arrangements facilitate sharing of management and decision-making functions; offer more flexible work schedules to allow reconciliation of professional and private roles; and consolidate office space to be more productive and responsive, among other advantages. In the medium and long term, there is a moral case for such fluid arrangements, which we argue in this paper. In this chapter, we use a conventionalist approach to explore the forces (and their consequences) that make this moral case emerge-i.e., the shaping of a new ideal worker as well as Human Resource Management (HRM) practices fostering individualisation and psychologization. We identify the absence of anthropological roots as the key element of the moral case of flexible work arrangements, and sketch out a research agenda to further investigate this employer-driven flexibility.
- Affiliations
Citations
Taskin, L. (2025). The business case versus the moral case for flexible working arrangements. In De Menezes, L. & Kelliher, C. (ed.), A Research Agenda for Flexible Working Arrangements (pp. 139-154). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317622.00020