Files

EARLI_2025_vanmeenenetal.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 880.58 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Research shows that peer-feedback, if used effectively, promotes learning. However, few studies have looked at the processing and use of peer-feedback by learners, and most of these have relied solely on eye-tracking data and on feedback from a single peer, fictional essays and fictional peer-feedback. This dissertation aimed to address this gap by exploring how higher education students process and use feedback from multiple peers to enhance a written essay. Four main research questions were formulated: (1) What factors influence learners’ implementation of feedback? (2) How do higher education students process and use (discrepant) peer-feedback? (3) What are the strategies used by 30 higher education students to process and use peer-feedback on a fictional essay? (4) What are the strategies used by 38 higher education students to process and use peer-feedback on their own essay? To address these questions, a systematic literature review and three empirical studies were conducted. Eye-tracking data were collected for each empirical study, coupled with CRR data in the last two empirical studies. The results of the different studies enabled us to identify the strategies students use to carry out a high-quality revision. The findings from the three empirical studies also led us to create an integrative model of peer-feedback processing. This model helps to understand how students cognitively process peer-feedback and use it.
Affiliations

Citations

Van Meenen, F., Masson, N., & Coertjens, L. (2025). How do students cognitively process and use peer feedback? “Realising Potentials through Education: Shaping the Minds and Brains for the Future”, Graz, Austria. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/270608