Negativity is Key for Understanding the Interplay Between Rumination’s Features, Attention Control, and Their Dynamic Nature: A Temporal Network Approach

Hoebeke, Yorgo;Blanchard, Annelise;Bernstein, Emily E.;McNally, Richard J.;Heeren, Alexandre
(2024) Cognitive Therapy and Research — Vol. 48, p. 774-780 (2024)

Files

Hoebeke_et_al_preprint_FINAL_CTR.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 378.09 KB

Details

Authors
  • Hoebeke, Yorgoorcid-logoUCLouvain
    Author
  • Blanchard, Anneliseorcid-logoUCLouvain
    Author
  • Bernstein, Emily E.orcid-logoMassachusetts General Hospital
    Author
  • McNally, Richard J.orcid-logoHarvard University
    Author
  • Author
Abstract
Background Rumination is a transdiagnostic correlate and risk factor for mental disorders. However, few studies have explored rumination and its components in everyday life, or their associations with other transdiagnostic processes, such as deficits in attention control, which may be an explanatory mechanism or consequence of rumination. Inspired by the Nolen-Hoeksema’s operationalization of rumination, we investigated the associations between five features of rumination and attention control. Method We conducted a study relying upon experience sampling methodology: forty participants answered six items four times per day over a two-week period. Using a multilevel vector autoregressive approach, we computed three networks representing temporal, contemporaneous, and between-subjects associations. Results The results showed that negativity of thoughts temporally drives all other features of rumination and was the only feature impoverishing attention control over time. Negativity was also the only feature negatively associated with attention control within the same time frame. In contrast, brooding was the only rumination feature to be associated with attention control in the between-subject network (i.e., similar to cross-sectional approach). Conclusion These results highlight negativity as a driving force of rumination and as a potent pathway in the interplay between rumination’s features and attention control. Although these results appear inconsistent with the hypothesis that impoverished attention control drives rumination, they fully align with the resource allocation hypothesis that engaging in negative thoughts depletes attentional resources.
Affiliations

Citations

Hoebeke, Y., Blanchard, A., Bernstein, E. E., McNally, R. J., & Heeren, A. (2024). Negativity is Key for Understanding the Interplay Between Rumination’s Features, Attention Control, and Their Dynamic Nature: A Temporal Network Approach. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 48, 774-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10432-2 (Original work published 2024)