The efficacy of manipulatives versus fingers in supporting young children's addition skills.

Lê, M-LT;Noël, Marie-Pascale;Thevenot, Catherine
(2024) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology — Vol. 244, n° august, p. 18 (2024)

Files

LeNoelThevenot2024.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 405.65 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Recent empirical investigations have revealed that finger counting is a strategy associated with good arithmetic performance in young children. Fingers could have a special status during development because they operate as external support that provide sensory- motor and kinesthetic affordances in addition to visual input. However, it was unknown whether fingers are more helpful than manipulatives such as tokens during arithmetic problem solving. To address this question, we conducted a study with 93 Vietnamese children (48 girls) aged 4 and 5 years (mean = 58 months, range = 47–63) with high arithmetic and counting skills from families with relatively high socioeconomic status. Their behaviors were observed as they solved addition problems with manipulatives at their disposal. We found that children sponta- neously used both manipulatives and fingers to solve the problems. Crucially, their performance was not higher when fingers rather than manipulatives were used (i.e., 70% vs. 81% correct answers, respectively). Therefore, at the beginning of learning, it is possible that, at least for children with high numerical skills, fingers are not the only gateway to efficient arithmetic development and manipu- latives might also lead to proficient arithmetic.
Affiliations

Citations

Lê, M.-L., Noël, M.-P., & Thevenot, C. (2024). The efficacy of manipulatives versus fingers in supporting young children’s addition skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 244(august), 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105931 (Original work published 2024)