Files

Filardo-Llamasetal2024authorversion.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 336.15 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Situated within studies on discourses about populism (De Cleen et al., 2018), this paper zooms in on the use, meanings, and role of the word populist in contemporary socio-political debates and, more specifically, on social media. This paper examines populist as stigma term (Kranert, 2020) and seeks to determine how people negotiate their categorisation as (non-)populist — and hence the meaning of this category — on Twitter. Based on the analysis of 139 tweets including the phrase “I am not populist” in four different languages (Dutch, French, English, Spanish), we propose that two patterns can be identified for the renegotiation of users’ identities as populist: denial and self-categorisation. This analysis confirms that populist as a category can refer to a variety of (political) attitudes and orientations and shows the consequences of the polysemous nature of populist while proving that, in certain contexts, populist refers to some specific and stable categories.
Affiliations

Citations

Filardo Llamas, L., De Cock, B., Hambye, P., & Shchinova Shchinov, N. (2025). “I am not populist” Mechanisms for the re-negotiation of category membership on Twitter. Pragmatics and Society, 16(5), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.24027.fil (Original work published 2025)