MAINTENANCE EN COURS / SITE UNDER MAINTENANCE

Une opération de maintenance est en cours: les résultats de recherches et les exportations peuvent être incohérent.
Site under maintenance: search & exportation results could be inconsistent.
 

Beyond Traditional Methods: Integrated Ground Penetrating Radar and Electromagnetic Induction Can Estimate Pore-Water Electrical Conductivity in Podzolic Soil.

Sashini Pathirana;Lakshman Galagedara;Lambot, Sébastien;Manokararajah Krishnapillai
(2025) CANVAS — Location: Salt Lake City (2025.November.9AD)

Files

BeyondTraditionalMethods_IntegratedGroundPenetratingRadarandElectromagneticInductionCanEstimatePore-WaterElectrical.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 124.64 KB

Details

Authors
  • Sashini Pathirana
    Author
  • Lakshman Galagedara
    Author
  • Author
  • Manokararajah Krishnapillai
    Author
Abstract
Pore-water electrical conductivity (ECw) is the most accurate index for soil salinity in agriculture, as it directly reflects the salinity level experienced by plant roots. However, its practical use is limited due to its dependence on soil water content (SWC) and labour-intensive, costly, and time-consuming process of pore-water extraction and analysis, especially for large-scale field applications. Near-surface geophysical techniques like ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) provide non-destructive, time-efficient and cost-effective methods with larger sampling volumes compared to traditional sampling to estimate soil properties and state variables. As a novel perspective, this study aimed to develop a non-destructive approach for estimating ECw in boreal podzolic soils by integrating GPR and EMI techniques while applying both stochastic and deterministic approaches at the field scale. EMI and GPR surveys were conducted before and after controlled irrigation events, and soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis as ground truthing. GPR was used to estimate SWC, EMI measured apparent electrical conductivity, and ECw and soil porosity were derived from soil sampling data for further analysis. The stochastic approach utilized multiple linear regression (MLR) models, while the deterministic approach involved modifying and evaluating Archie’s equation. The developed MLR models demonstrated high accuracy (R2 = 0.75 between measured and predicted ECw). Both approaches provided reliable ECw predictions, with low root mean square error (RMSE) values—less than 1.67 mS/m for the stochastic model and 2.65 mS/m for the deterministic model. However, modifications were necessary for the parameters in Archie’s equation, as they deviated from laboratory-estimated parameters. At the study site, the stochastic approach outperformed the deterministic approach. Future research should focus on refining these models to enhance their applicability across different soil textures and SWC conditions, aiming to further improve the accuracy and reliability of soil salinity assessments in diverse agricultural landscapes.
Affiliations

Citations

Sashini Pathirana, Lakshman Galagedara, Lambot, S., & Manokararajah Krishnapillai. (2025). Beyond Traditional Methods: Integrated Ground Penetrating Radar and Electromagnetic Induction Can Estimate Pore-Water Electrical Conductivity in Podzolic Soil. CANVAS, Salt Lake City.