A cognitive account of subjectivity put to the test: using an insertion task to investigate Mandarin result connectives
(2021) Cognitive Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of cognitive science — Vol. 32, n° 4, p. 671-702 (2021)
Files
Xiaoetal2021c_CognitiveLinguistics324.pdf
printed
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 1.19 MB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- This article aims to further test the cognitive claims of the so-called subjectivity account of causal events and their linguistic markers, causal connectives. We took Mandarin Chinese, a language that is typologically completely different from the usual western languages, as a case to provide evidence for this subjectivity account. Complementary to the commonly used corpora analyses, we employed crowdsourcing to tap native speakers’ intuitions about causal coherence, focusing on four result connectives kějiàn ‘therefore’, suǒyǐ ‘so’, yīncǐ ‘so/for this reason’ and yúshì ‘thereupon/as a result’. The analysis shows systematic differences regarding the use of connectives in relations that differ in terms of subjectivity, demonstrating that native speakers make use of subjectivity to encode and decode different types of causal relations in discourse. Moreover, our study evidences that a comprehensive model of subjectivity should include the epistemic dimension of certainty about the subjectivity scale that might be indicated by other linguistic elements. In-depth analyses of the test items revealed that the presence/absence of modality words in the result segments are related to different preferential patterns for the connectives. There is a trade-off between the epistemic dimension of certainty and the expression of subjectivity in the four connectives involved.
- Affiliations
Citations
Xiao, H., van Hout, R. W. N. M., Sanders, T. J. M., & Spooren, W. P. M. S. (2021). A cognitive account of subjectivity put to the test: using an insertion task to investigate Mandarin result connectives. Cognitive Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of cognitive science, 32(4), 671-702. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0075 (Original work published 2021)