Constructionist Approaches to Language Teaching
(2018) International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG10) — Location: Sorbonne Nouvelle et l’Université Paris 3 (2018.July.16AD)
Files
ThematicSession_SDK_CW_FS_Formatiert.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 4.3 MB
Details
- Authors
De Knop, Sabine 
- Abstract
- Recent research in foreign language teaching (FLT) and learning (FLL) has widely recognized the need to focus not only on what should be learned but also on how learning processes can be fostered (Boers et al. 2010; Herbst 2016). In learning a foreign language the use of both authentic language data and larger linguistic sequences seem to play a central role (see among others Boers 2011, Nattinger & DeCarrico 1992, Wong-Fillmore 1976, or Wray 2002) next to the communicative competence both in general and more specialized settings (Boers 2011; De Knop et al. 2015). A Construction Grammar (CxG) based approach can contribute in a substantial way to optimizing the process of learning a foreign language (compare Ellis & Cadierno 2009, Ellis et al. 2016, and Robinson & Ellis 2008). In this framework, most studies are based on Goldberg’s (1995 and 2006) model, which defines constructions as conventional form-meaning mappings with different degrees of abstractness and open slots to be filled. Having a meaning of their own, such abstract constructions enable learners to infer the meaning of new constructional instantiations from previous knowledge associated with these constructions. This assumption is highly relevant for both teaching and learning foreign language structures. But CxG has more to offer to FLT and FLL, e.g. the definition of semantic links between constructions or the description of a constructicon. Still, except for the volume edited by De Knop & Gilquin (2016), up to now little research has been done on the usefulness of the construction-based approach in the context of FLT and FLL. The thematic session wants to make up for this deficit and to deal among others with the following questions: What does the mental representation of the L1 and L2 constructions look like and to what extent do they interact with each other? In how far can insights from research into embodiment and metaphors contribute to optimizing construction-based teaching approaches? How can form-meaning mismatches between L1 and L2 constructions be presented to learners in order to facilitate L2 language learning? How can the most relevant constructions of a language (both L1 and L2) be defined and how useful is a constructicon of the foreign language? What is the role of a construction-based approach in teaching and learning specialized languages? Against this backdrop, the present introductory talk to the theme session will examine the contribution of the most advanced research in the field of applied cognitive linguistics to answering some of these questions. Furthermore, it will explore some learning and teaching pathways in creating synergies between different methodological approaches in order to leverage and open up new perspectives for construction-based foreign language teaching. Literature Boers, Frank (2011). Cognitive Semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: An assessment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9, 227–261. Boers, Frank, Antoon De Rycker, & Sabine De Knop (2010). Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In De Knop, Sabine, Frank Boers & Antoon De Rycker, Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency through CL, 1-27. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. De Knop, Sabine & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds.) (2016), Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter. Ellis, Nick C. & Teresa Cadierno (2009). Constructing a second language. Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7, 11-139. Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer & Matthew Brook O'Donnell (2016). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goldberg, Adele (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Herbst, Thomas (2016). Foreign language learning is construction learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In De Knop, Sabine & Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Applied Construction Grammar, 21-52. Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter. Nattinger, James R. & Jeanette S. DeCarrico (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Robinson, Peter & Nick C. Ellis (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge. Wong-Fillmore, Lily (1976). The Second Time Around. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University Press. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Affiliations
Citations
De Knop, S., Suner Munoz, F., & Wermuth, C. (2018). Constructionist Approaches to Language Teaching. International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG10), Sorbonne Nouvelle et l’Université Paris 3. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/237437