Evolutionary ecology of dispersal in biodiverse spatially structured systems: what is old and what is new?

Fronhofer, Emanuel A.;Bonte, Dries;Bestion, Elvire;Cote, Julien;Massol, François;et.al.
(2024) Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B — Vol. 379, n° 1907, p. 1-14 (2024)

Files

81-Fronhoferetal-2024-PhilTransRoySocB.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 944.69 KB

Details

Authors
  • Fronhofer, Emanuel A.orcid-logoISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier 34095, France
    Author
  • Bonte, Driesorcid-logoTerrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, Ghent B-9000, Belgium
    Author
  • Bestion, Elvireorcid-logoStation d’Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, CNRS, UAR 2029, Moulis F-09200, France
    Author
  • Cote, Julienorcid-logoLaboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique, CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, IRD, UMR 5174, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse F-31062, France
    Author
  • Author
  • Massol, FrançoisInstitut Pasteur de Lille, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1019 - UMR 9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille 59000, France
    Author
Show more
Abstract
Context-dependent dispersal allows organisms to seek and settle in habitats improving their fitness. Despite the importance of species interactions in determining fitness, a quantitative synthesis of how they affect dispersal is lacking. We present a meta-analysis asking (i) whether the interaction experienced and/or perceived by a focal species (detrimental interaction with predators, competitors, parasites or beneficial interaction with resources, hosts, mutualists) affects its dispersal; and (ii) how the species' ecological and biological background affects the direction and strength of this interaction-dependent dispersal. After a systematic search focusing on actively dispersing species, we extracted 397 effect sizes from 118 empirical studies encompassing 221 species pairs; arthropods were best represented, followed by vertebrates, protists and others. Detrimental species interactions increased the focal species’ dispersal (adjusted effect: 0.33 [0.06, 0.60]), while beneficial interactions decreased it (−0.55 [−0.92, −0.17]). The effect depended on the dispersal phase, with detrimental interactors having opposite impacts on emigration and transience. Interaction-dependent dispersal was negatively related to species’ interaction strength, and depended on the global community composition, with cues of presence having stronger effects than the presence of the interactor and the ecological complexity of the community. Our work demonstrates the importance of interspecific interactions on dispersal plasticity, with consequences for metacommunity dynamics.
Affiliations

Citations

Fronhofer, E. A., Bonte, D., Bestion, E., Cote, J., Deshpande, J. N., Duncan, A. B., Hovestadt, T., Kaltz, O., Keith, S. A., Kokko, H., Legrand, D., Malusare, S. P., Parmentier, T., Saade, C., Schtickzelle, N., Zilio, G., & Massol, F. (2024). Evolutionary ecology of dispersal in biodiverse spatially structured systems: what is old and what is new? Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, 379(1907), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0142 (Original work published 2024)