Aspects de l'argumentation élaborée par Taqī l-Dīn Ahmad b. Taymiyya (m. 728/1328) dans son livre du Rejet de la contradiction entre raison et Écriture (Dar' ta'ārud al-'aql wa-l-naql)

Zouggar, Nadjet
(2014) Arabica : journal of Arabic and Islamic studies/revue d’etudes arabes et islamiques — Vol. 61, n° 1-2, p. 1-17 (2014)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
  • Zouggar, NadjetUCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
This article aims at elucidating aspects of the argumentation elaborated by the Hanbali scholar Taqī l-Dīn Ahmad b. Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) in one of his most important opera : Averting the conflict between reason and [religious] tradition (Dar' ta'ārud al-'aql wal- naql). The book's purpose is to refute the rationalist hermeneutic theory taught by some of the major figures of the Sunni speculative theology. Among forty-four answers (or cases, wuǧūh) which compose the work, we bring into light the first five cases set by the author. Our objective is to illustrate the premises of the dialectical discourse expounded by Ibn Taymiyya in this major work. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2014.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Zouggar, N. (2014). Aspects de l’argumentation élaborée par Taqī l-Dīn Ahmad b. Taymiyya (m. 728/1328) dans son livre du Rejet de la contradiction entre raison et Écriture (Dar’ ta’ārud al-’aql wa-l-naql). Arabica : journal of Arabic and Islamic studies/revue d’etudes arabes et islamiques, 61(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-12341289 (Original work published 2014)