Artifacts as authoritative actors in educational reform. Routines, institutional pressures, and legitimacy in student data systems

März, Virginie;Kelchtermans, Geert;Vermeir, Karen
(2017) Journal of Educational Change — Vol. 18, n° 4, p. 439-464 (2017)

Files

Märzetal_2017_JEC_Published.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 339.7 KB

Details

Authors
  • Author
  • Kelchtermans, GeertKU Leuven
    Author
  • Vermeir, KarenKU Leuven
    Author
Abstract
Educational reforms are often translated in and implemented through artifacts. Although research has frequently treated artifacts as merely functional, more recent work acknowledges the complex relationship between material artifacts and human/organizational behavior. This article aims at disentangling this rela- tionship in order to deepen our understanding of the role of artifacts within pro- cesses of educational change. In particular, we study the implementation of a data- transfer instrument developed to stimulate care continuity between primary and secondary schools. In order to understand an artifact’s authority and to unravel its role in processes of innovation, we turned to organizational routines and neo-in- stitutional theory. Drawing on data from an artifact analysis and semi-structured interviews, this article reports how this artifact not only transfers data, but also changed the discursive interactions (routines) in the school team around care. From an institutional perspective, implementing the artifact can be viewed as an answer to institutional forces that are pressurizing organizations to conform to particular ideas of what care and care continuity should ideally look like. The use of the artifact contributed to the schools’ organizational legitimacy by serving their symbolic needs and it enabled them to position themselves towards stakeholders, parents and other schools as a truly legitimate school.
Affiliations

Citations

März, V., Kelchtermans, G., & Vermeir, K. (2017). Artifacts as authoritative actors in educational reform. Routines, institutional pressures, and legitimacy in student data systems. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 439-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9309-9 (Original work published 2017)