Effect of Five Different Recovery Methods on Repeated Cycle Performance

de Pauw, Kevin; de Geus, Sebastiaan; Roelands, Bart; Lauwens, Floris; Verschueren, Jo; Heyman, Elsa; Meeusen, Romain R.

doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318200d25f

Effect of Five Different Recovery Methods on Repeated Cycle Performance

de Pauw, Kevin

;

de Geus, Sebastiaan

;

Roelands, Bart

;

Lauwens, Floris

;

Meeusen, Romain R.

;et.al.

(2011) Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise — Vol. 43, n° 5, p. 890-897 (2011)

Files

DePauwKetalRecoveryCycling-2011.pdf

Closed Access
Adobe PDF
454.9 KB

Request a copy

Details

Authors

de Pauw, KevinVUB
Author
de Geus, SebastiaanUCLouvain
Author
Roelands, BartVUB
Author
Lauwens, FlorisVUB
Author
Meeusen, Romain R.VUB
Author

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of five different recovery strategies on repeated simulated time trial (TT) performance on a stationary cycle ergometer.

Affiliations

UCLouvainSSH/IACS - Institute of Analysis of Change in Contemporary and Historical Societies

Citations

APA
Chicago
FWB

de Pauw, K., de Geus, S., Roelands, B., Lauwens, F., Verschueren, J., Heyman, E., & Meeusen, R. R. (2011). Effect of Five Different Recovery Methods on Repeated Cycle Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(5), 890-897. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318200d25f (Original work published 2011)