In a context in which many subjects cannot be pinned down within classic religious frameworks, and subsequently engage in certain recompositions of meaning— can these be reduced to a set of connotations, unhappily rendered banal by the application of the label, ‘‘bricolage’’? Is it not rather the case that we are faced with evidence of symbolic transactions of greater importance, and which rather exceed the limit of the narrow description ‘‘religious bricolage’’?
Christians, L.-L., & Servais, O. (2005). Religious Bricolage? How Do We Conceptualize the ‘‘Mixture’’ ofReligions? Social Compass : international review of sociology of religion, 52(3), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768605055646 (Original work published 2005)