MAINTENANCE EN COURS / SITE UNDER MAINTENANCE

Une opération de maintenance est en cours: les résultats de recherches et les exportations peuvent être incohérent.
Site under maintenance: search & exportation results could be inconsistent.
 

Comment on: “Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies”

Dewolf, Arthur;Da Rosa Macedo Mesquita, Raphael;Willems, Patrick
(2020) Sports Medicine : reviews of applied medicine and science in sport and exercise — Vol. 50, n° 9, p. 1695-1698 (2020)

Files

Dewolf-SportsMedicine.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 1 MB
Download

Details

Authors
Abstract
Dear Editor, Another critical factor presented in the current study may contribute to the observed biomechani- cal differences: the belt-speed variations [4, 7–10], which depends on technical specifications of the MT [11]. Despite the potential importance of this aspect, the authors do not suggest any perspective to take into account this factor in future studies. Accordingly, we wish to take this opportunity to shed light on the potential effect of the intra-stride belt-speed variability on the biomechanics of running particularly, to the difference in the braking/pushing phases of running. To do so, we have re-analysed the data of Dewolf et al. [12, 13] considering the instantaneous velocity of the belt.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Dewolf, A., Da Rosa Macedo Mesquita, R., & Willems, P. (2020). Comment on: “Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies”. Sports Medicine : reviews of applied medicine and science in sport and exercise, 50(9), 1695-1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01304-w (Original work published 2020)