Rituximab versus tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R4RA): 16-week outcomes of a stratified, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial.

Humby, Frances;Durez, Patrick;Buch, Maya H;Lewis, Myles J;R4RA collaborative group;et.al.
(2021) The Lancet — Vol. 397, n° 10271, p. 305-317 (2021)

Files

Rituximabversustocilizumab.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 599.97 KB
Download

Details

Authors
  • Humby, Frances
    Author
  • Durez, PatrickUCLouvain
    Author
  • Buch, Maya H
    Author
  • Lewis, Myles J
    Author
  • Lauwerys, BernardUCLouvain
    Author
  • R4RA collaborative group
    Collaborator
Show more
Abstract
(en) BACKGROUND: Although targeted biological treatments have transformed the outlook for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 40% of patients show poor clinical response, which is mechanistically still unexplained. Because more than 50% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have low or absent CD20 B cells-the target for rituximab-in the main disease tissue (joint synovium), we hypothesised that, in these patients, the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab would be more effective. The aim of this trial was to compare the effect of tocilizumab with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) stratified for synovial B-cell status. METHODS: This study was a 48-week, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial (rituximab vs tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis; R4RA) done in 19 centres across five European countries (the UK, Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Spain). Patients aged 18 years or older who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and were eligible for treatment with rituximab therapy according to UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines were eligible for inclusion in the trial. To inform balanced stratification, following a baseline synovial biopsy, patients were classified histologically as B-cell poor or rich. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) centrally in block sizes of six and four to receive two 1000 mg rituximab infusions at an interval of 2 weeks (rituximab group) or 8 mg/kg tocilizumab infusions at 4-week intervals (tocilizumab group). To enhance the accuracy of the stratification of B-cell poor and B-cell rich patients, baseline synovial biopsies from all participants were subjected to RNA sequencing and reclassified by B-cell molecular signature. The study was powered to test the superiority of tocilizumab over rituximab in the B-cell poor population at 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was defined as a 50% improvement in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI50%) from baseline. The trial is registered on the ISRCTN database, ISRCTN97443826, and EudraCT, 2012-002535-28. [...]
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Humby, F., Durez, P., Buch, M. H., Lewis, M. J., Rizvi, H., Rivellese, F., Nerviani, A., Giorli, G., Mahto, A., Montecucco, C., Lauwerys, B., Ng, N., Ho, P., Bombardieri, M., Romão, V. C., Verschueren, P., Kelly, S., Sainaghi, P. P., Gendi, N., et al. (2021). Rituximab versus tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R4RA): 16-week outcomes of a stratified, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 397(10271), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32341-2 (Original work published 2021)