Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction

Becce, Fabio;Ben Salah, Yosr;Verdun, Francis R;Vande Berg, Bruno;Omoumi, Patrick;et.al.
(2013) Skeletal Radiology : journal of radiology, pathology and orthopedics — Vol. 42, n° 7, p. 937-945 (2013)

Files

pdfdocument.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 534.81 KB
Request a copy

Details

Authors
  • Becce, FabioUCLouvain
    Author
  • Ben Salah, YosrUCLouvain
    Author
  • Verdun, Francis R
    Author
  • Vande Berg, BrunoUCLouvain
    Author
  • Lecouvet, FrédéricUCLouvain
    Author
  • Omoumi, PatrickUCLouvain
    Author
Show more
Abstract
Objective: To compare image quality of a standard-dose (SD) and a low-dose (LD) cervical spine CT protocol using filtered back-projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). Materials and methods: Forty patients investigated by cervical spine CT were prospectively randomised into two groups: SD (120 kVp, 275 mAs) and LD (120 kVp, 150 mAs), both applying automatic tube current modulation. Data were reconstructed using both FBP and sinogram-affirmed IR. Image noise, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios were measured. Two radiologists independently and blindly assessed the following anatomical structures at C3-C4 and C6-C7 levels, using a four-point scale: intervertebral disc, content of neural foramina and dural sac, ligaments, soft tissues and vertebrae. They subsequently rated overall image quality using a ten-point scale. Results: For both protocols and at each disc level, IR significantly decreased image noise and increased SNR and CNR, compared with FBP. SNR and CNR were statistically equivalent in LD-IR and SD-FBP protocols. Regardless of the dose and disc level, the qualitative scores with IR compared with FBP, and with LD-IR compared with SD-FBP, were significantly higher or not statistically different for intervertebral discs, neural foramina and ligaments, while significantly lower or not statistically different for soft tissues and vertebrae. The overall image quality scores were significantly higher with IR compared with FBP, and with LD-IR compared with SD-FBP. Conclusion: LD-IR cervical spine CT provides better image quality for intervertebral discs, neural foramina and ligaments, and worse image quality for soft tissues and vertebrae, compared with SD-FBP, while reducing radiation dose by approximately 40 %.
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Becce, F., Ben Salah, Y., Verdun, F. R., Vande Berg, B., Lecouvet, F., Meuli, R., & Omoumi, P. (2013). Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. Skeletal Radiology : journal of radiology, pathology and orthopedics, 42(7), 937-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1576-9 (Original work published 2013)