This talk focuses on Iris Murdoch and Mary Midgley’s understanding of conceptual methods in philosophy, particularly in ethics. First, I will explore some elements of Murdoch's conception of philosophical reflection in ethics as an 'imaginative exploration' (Murdoch 1956). Then, I will delve into Midgley's analogy between philosophy and plumbing (Midgley 1992). I will highlight commonalities between their views, specifically addressing: (1) the relationship between philosophy, science, and literature; (2) the idea of a form of 'responsibility' in philosophical practice; (3) the conceptual dimension of the method and objects of philosophy. Against this backdrop, I will argue that Midgley and Murdoch share a (Wittgensteinian) conception of philosophy as a therapeutic and transformative relationship to concepts. This conception involves the temperament and responsibility of philosophers in a way that is not only incompatible with non- cognitivist theories of moral language of the 20 century, but also differs from conceptual engineering approaches in contemporary ethics.
Boldrini, M. (2023). Iris Murdoch and Mary Midgley on ethics and philosophical methods. ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY AND THE «OXFORD QUARTET», UCLouvain Saint-Louis Bruxelles. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/25493