Thinking counterfactually after a negative event is a common response. Such thoughts serve various
functions, from protecting one’s self-image to guiding future behavior. However, the role of receiving
counterfactuals generated by others has received little attention. Our project addresses this gap by
examining how people react to counterfactual statements expressed by someone they are in conflict
with. In interpersonal conflicts, both parties often see themselves as the main victim, which reduces
their willingness to reconcile and fuels further escalation. Yet, when the other acknowledges their role in
the conflict, by reflecting on what they could or should have done differently, it may increase the victim’s
willingness to reconcile. Building on this idea, we propose a series of studies to investigate the effects of
receiving others’ counterfactuals in conflict situations. We hypothesize that such expressions reduce
individuals’ need for power and, in turn, promote greater willingness to reconcile. Our studies will
combine scenario-based tasks, personal recall, and interactive conflict paradigms using game-like
settings. Beyond willingness to reconcile, we will examine emotional responses such as guilt and self
blame, emotions known to be shaped by counterfactual thinking and to strongly influence reparative
intentions.
Rouard, M., Kasper, A., Demoulin, S., & Woltin, K.-A. (2026, March 17). The role of receiving others’ counterfactual thoughts in interpersonal conflict situations. EASP Meeting – Counterfactual Thinking and its Role in Cognition and Communication, Groningen, The Netherlands. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/277335