Must we press on until a young mother dies? Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour may not be suited as a "poor man's epidural"
(2013) BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth — Vol. 13, n° 1, p. 139 [1-8] (2013)
Files
2013-Kranke-BMCPregnancyChildbirth.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 202.77 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- The epidural route is still considered the gold standard for labour analgesia, although it is not without serious consequences when incorrect placement goes unrecognized, e.g. in case of intravascular, intrathecal and subdural placements. Until now there has not been a viable alternative to epidural analgesia especially in view of the neonatal outcome and the need for respiratory support when long-acting opioids are used via the parenteral route. Pethidine and meptazinol are far from ideal having been described as providing rather sedation than analgesia, affecting the cardiotocograph (CTG), causing fetal acidosis and having active metabolites with prolonged half-lives especially in the neonate. Despite these obvious shortcomings, intramuscular and intravenously administered pethidine and comparable substances are still frequently used in delivery units. Since the end of the 90 ths remifentanil administered in a patient-controlled mode (PCA) had been reported as a useful alternative for labour analgesia in those women who either don't want, can't have or don't need epidural analgesia.
- Affiliations
Citations
Kranke, P., Girard, T., Lavand’homme, P., Melber, A., Jokinen, J., Muellenbach, R. M., Wirbelauer, J., & Hönig, A. (2013). Must we press on until a young mother dies? Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour may not be suited as a “poor man’s epidural”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1), 139 [1-8]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-139 (Original work published 2013)