Accidental bequests: a curse for the rich and a boon for the poor

Cremer, Helmuth;Gahvari, Firouz;Pestieau, Pierre
(2012) The Scandinavian journal of economics — Vol. 114, n° 4, p. 1437-1459 (2012)

Files

Rep2462.pdf
  • Closed Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 337.88 KB

Details

Authors
  • Cremer, HelmuthToulouse School of Economics
    Author
  • Gahvari, FirouzUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Author
  • Pestieau, PierreUniversité de Liège
    Author
Abstract
When accidental bequests signal otherwise unobservable individual characteristics, such as productivity and longevity, the population should be partitioned into two groups: those who do not receive an inheritance and those who do. The first tagged group receives a Mirrlees second-best tax schedule; the second group, when its type is fully revealed, faces a first-best tax schedule. Receiving an inheritance makes high-ability types worse off and low-ability types better off. High-ability individuals face a bequest tax of more than 100 percent, while low-ability types face a bequest tax that can be smaller, as well as larger, than 100 percent, and it might even be negative.
Affiliations
  • Toulouse School of Economics
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Université de Liège

Citations

Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., & Pestieau, P. (2012). Accidental bequests: a curse for the rich and a boon for the poor. The Scandinavian journal of economics, 114(4), 1437-1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01728.x (Original work published 2012)