Etest® versus broth microdilution for ceftaroline MIC determination with Staphylococcus aureus: results from PREMIUM, a European multicentre study.

Cantón, Rafael;Livermore, David M;Morosini, María Isabel;Díaz-Regañón, Jazmín;Glupczynski, Gerald;et.al.
(2017) Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy — Vol. 72, n° 2, p. 431-436 (2017)

Files

2017_Canton_J_Antimicrob_Chemother.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 237.84 KB

Details

Authors
  • Cantón, Rafael
    Author
  • Livermore, David M
    Author
  • Morosini, María Isabel
    Author
  • Díaz-Regañón, Jazmín
    Author
  • Collaborator
  • Glupczynski, GeraldUCLouvain
    Collaborator
Show more
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the concordance of ceftaroline MIC values by reference broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest (bioMérieux, France) for MSSA and MRSA isolates obtained from PREMIUM (D372SL00001), a European multicentre study. METHODS: Ceftaroline MICs were determined by reference BMD and by Etest for 1242 MSSA and MRSA isolates collected between February and May 2012 from adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia or complicated skin and soft tissue infections; tests were performed across six European laboratories. Selected isolates with ceftaroline resistance in broth (MIC >1 mg/L) were retested in three central laboratories to confirm their behaviour. RESULTS: Overall concordance between BMD and Etest was good, with >97% essential agreement and >95% categorical agreement. Nevertheless, 12 of the 26 MRSA isolates found resistant by BMD scored as susceptible by Etest, with MICs ≤1 mg/L, thus counting as very major errors, whereas only 5 of 380 MRSA isolates found ceftaroline susceptible in BMD were miscategorized as resistant by Etest. Twenty-one of the 26 isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L by BMD were then retested twice by each of three central laboratories: BMD MICs of 2 mg/L were consistently found for 19 of the 21 isolates. Among 147 Etest results for these 21 isolates (original plus six repeats per isolate) 112 were >1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: BMD and Etest have good overall agreement for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus; nevertheless, reliable Etest-based discrimination of the minority of ceftaroline-resistant (MIC 2 mg/L) MRSA is extremely challenging, requiring careful reading of strips, ideally with duplicate testing.
Affiliations

Citations

Cantón, R., Livermore, D. M., Morosini, M. I., Díaz-Regañón, J., & Rossolini, G. M. (2017). Etest® versus broth microdilution for ceftaroline MIC determination with Staphylococcus aureus: results from PREMIUM, a European multicentre study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 72(2), 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw442 (Original work published 2017)