Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation
(2004) Biological Conservation — Vol. 120, n° 4, p. 471-480 (2004)
Files
pdfdocument.pdf
Restricted Access - Adobe PDF
- 199.65 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- Reserve networks are a major tool of ecological management aiming at biodiversity conservation. Maximizing the number of species conserved with the minimum land sacrifice is a primary requirement in reserve design. In this study, we examine the efficiency of five different scenarios to conserve: (i) the biodiversity of one target group and (ii) the overall biodiversity of an area. The study was conducted in Dadia Reserve, in northern Greece. Six groups of species were selected to represent its biodiversity: woody plants, orchids, Orthoptera, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna, and small terrestrial birds. The scenarios examined represent different conservation approaches to select network sites. For each approach, the starting point was one of the above six groups of species, considered as the target group. In scenario A, which reflects the hotspot approach, the sites richest in species are selected. Scenario B selects the sites most complementary in terms of species richness. The next two scenarios use the principle of environmental representativeness, expressed in terms of habitat (scenario C) or vegetation (scenario D). Under scenario E, sites forming the network are selected at random. The rank of scenarios in terms of preserving the species of the target group was always B > A > C > D > E, irrespective of the group considered as target group. Their rank, when preservation of the total biodiversity was the issue, was B, A > C, D > E. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Affiliations
Citations
Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufrêne, M., Legakis, A., Vokou, D., & Lebrun, P. (2004). Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 120(4), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.020 (Original work published 2004)