Background: Biologicals have revolutionized care for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Currently, real-world efficacy (RWE) data of dupilumab in patients who switch to dupilumab after having no or minimal therapeutic
response to either omalizumab or mepolizumab are lacking. No comparison has been performed between patients switching
from omalizumab or mepolizumab to dupilumab and those receiving dupilumab as their first biological. Aim: 55 CRSwNP pa
tients receiving dupilumab in the RELIBIO trial were divided into those who were biological naive (n = 30) and those who showed
no to poor therapeutic response to 6 months therapy with either omalizumab or mepolizumab (n = 25), with evaluation of the
following parameters at baseline and 6 months: SNOT-22 scores, nasal congestion scores (NCS), VAS scores for nasal obstruction,
smell loss and postnasal drip, ACQ-5, AQLQ and total nasal polyp scores (TNPS). We determined disease control and therapeutic
response evaluation (TRE) at 6 months for both groups using the EUFOREA/EPOS criteria. Results: Dupilumab showed signifi
cant improvements on all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and TNPS in both groups. When comparing the efficacy
between switchers and naive patients, dupilumab showed equal efficacy in both groups on SNOT-22, TNPS, NCS, VAS scores for
smell loss, nasal blockage and postnasal drip, ACQ-5 and AQLQ. A good to excellent therapeutic response at 6 months was ob
served in 67% of switchers compared to 97% of the biological naive patients. Regarding disease control at 6 months, we observed
44% being controlled in the switchers and 67% in the biological naive group, with smell loss being the main reason for not being
controlled. Conclusion: This prospective RWE study shows that dupilumab significantly reduced symptom severity and nasal
polyp scores in CRSwNP patients at 6 months of therapy, also in those showing a minimal therapeutic response to mepolizumab
or omalizumab. Patients in the biologic naive group showed a higher likelihood of achieving disease control.
Lammens, J., Viskens, A., Verstappen, G., Halewyck, S., Verhaeghe, B., Cox, C., Hox, V., Lemmens, W., Rogister, F., Speleman, K., Vanderveken, O., & Hellings, P. (2026). Real world efficacy of dupilumab in switchers versus biological naive CRSwNP patients. Rhinology Journal, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.4193/rhin26.041 (Original work published 2026)