Shelf acetabuloplasty in Perthes disease: comparison with nonoperative treatment

Parmentier, Charles;Madoki, Alexandre;Mercier, Pierrick;Docquier, Pierre-Louis
(2016) Current Orthopaedic Practice : a review and research journal — Vol. 27, n° 4, p. 375-381 (2016)

Files

2016_Parmentier_Curr_Orthop_Pract.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 280.49 KB

Details

Authors
  • Parmentier, CharlesUCLouvain
    Author
  • Madoki, AlexandreUCLouvain
    Author
  • Mercier, Pierrick
    Author
  • Author
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic results between operatively and nonoperatively treated hips in patients with Perthes disease. Methods: Eighty children (88 hips) treated for Perthes disease were retrospectively reviewed with focus on the radiographic result at a mean follow-up of 6.3 yr (range 2.0 to 12.9 yr). Forty-seven hips had shelf acetabuloplasty, and 41 hips were treated nonoperatively. The radiographs were evaluated at the time of diagnosis, at 4 wk and 3 yr postoperatively (for the shelf group) and finally at latest follow-up for both groups. Results: In the nonoperatively treated group, the prognosis was initially better than in the shelf group: younger age at the time of diagnosis (4.7 vs. 6.1 yr), more Herring type A and fewer Herring type C, fewer “head at risk” signs. Stulberg’s classification at the latest follow-up showed Stulberg 1, 2 or 3 in 85% and Stulberg 4 in 15% in the nonoperative group compared with 89% and 11%, respectively, in the shelf group. Acetabular depth ratio and the migration index were better in the shelf group. Conclusions: Despite initial worse prognostic factors, final radiographic result seemed to be better in the shelf group. The shelf procedure showed radiographic improvement in the hip in Perthes disease.
Affiliations

Citations

Parmentier, C., Madoki, A., Mercier, P., & Docquier, P.-L. (2016). Shelf acetabuloplasty in Perthes disease: comparison with nonoperative treatment. Current Orthopaedic Practice : a review and research journal, 27(4), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000402 (Original work published 2016)