Preferences of urban Zimbabweans for health and life lived at different ages.

Jelsma, Jennifer;Shumba, Darlies;Kristian, Hansen;De Weerdt, Willy;De Cock, Paul
(2002) Bulletin of the World Health Organization — Vol. 80, n° 3, p. 204-209 (2002)

Files

11984606.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 184.9 KB

Details

Authors
  • Jelsma, JenniferUCLouvain
    Author
  • Shumba, DarliesPhysiotherapist, Mpilo General Hospital, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
    Author
  • Kristian, HansenHealth Economist, Department of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe Harare, Zimbabwe
    Author
  • De Weerdt, WillyUCLouvain
    Author
  • De Cock, PaulUCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the age-weighting preferences of urban Zimbabweans in relation to health care priorities. METHOD: A total of 67 randomly selected residents of a high-density area of Harare participated in the study. Participants were asked "person trade-off" questions to determine their preferences in terms of the numbers of people of various ages who would be saved from death and from suffering a year of ill-health relative to the number of 30-year-olds who would be saved from these eventualities. FINDINGS: The responses indicate that the value of averting a year of ill-health was judged greatest for 15-year-olds and was equal for people aged 1, 30, and 45 years. The value of averting a death primarily reflected the expected years of life lost, but the influence of age-weighting was evident in that 15 years was the most highly valued age. CONCLUSION: Although the age-weighting curves did not correspond exactly with the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) age-weights, Zimbabweans showed a preference for saving the lives of young adults. The GBD age-weights should be used to determine the disability-adjusted life years lost in the Zimbabwean population.
Affiliations

Citations

Jelsma, J., Shumba, D., Kristian, H., De Weerdt, W., & De Cock, P. (2002). Preferences of urban Zimbabweans for health and life lived at different ages. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(3), 204-209. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/77299 (Original work published 2002)