Entitlement theory of justice and end-state fairness in the allocation of goods

Ju, Biung-Ghi;Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.
(2018) Economics and Philosophy — Vol. 34, n° 03, p. 317-341 (2018)

Files

REP2989.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 596.72 KB

Details

Authors
  • Ju, Biung-GhiSeoul National University
    Author
  • Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.UCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
Robert Nozick allegedly introduced his liberal theory of private ownership as an objection to theories of end-state justice. Nevertheless, we show that, in a stylized framework for the allocation of goods in joint ventures, both approaches can be seen as complementary. More precisely, in such a context, self-ownership (the basis for Nozick's entitlement theory of justice) followed by voluntary transfer (Nozick's principle of just transfer) can lead to end-state fairness (as well as Pareto efficiency). Furthermore, under a certain solidarity condition, the only way to achieve end-state fairness, following Nozick's procedure, is to endorse an egalitarian rule for the initial assignment of rights.
Affiliations

Citations

Ju, B.-G., & Moreno-Ternero, J. D. (2018). Entitlement theory of justice and end-state fairness in the allocation of goods. Economics and Philosophy, 34(03), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267117000232 (Original work published 2018)