I should have listened to you, you should have been respectful: Thinking counterfactually after interpersonal conflict increases feeling of guilt.

(2026) 20th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology — Location: Strasbourg, France (1.July.2026)

Files

RM_EASP_GM_2026.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 131.89 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Interpersonal conflicts are common in daily life and can negatively impact relationships. Thus, understanding psychological processes promoting reconciliation is important. Feeling guilty has been identified as a key predictor of such reparative intentions. Yet, individuals engaged in conflict generally minimize their own responsibility, which reduces their felt guilt, and instead focus on the other party’s actions. Moreover, counterfactual thoughts–mental simulations of alternative past actions and resulting outcomes–are known to influence people’s emotions. We propose that prompting individuals to reflect counterfactually on their own contribution to the conflict and its escalation may counter this tendency. Accordingly, in a study involving participants (N = 256) imaging a conflict with a colleague to which both parties’ contributed we examined how thought type (counterfactual vs. factual) and focus (self vs. other) shape feelings of guilt. As expected, participants focusing on their own actions reported more guilt than those focusing on the other. Unexpectedly, this effect was moderated by thought type, such that counterfactual (vs. factual) thinking increased guilt among participants reflecting on the other person, but not on themselves.
Affiliations

Citations

Rouard, M., Woltin, K.-A., & Demoulin, S. (2026, July 2). I should have listened to you, you should have been respectful: Thinking counterfactually after interpersonal conflict increases feeling of guilt. 20th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Strasbourg, France. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/277333