Cremer, HelmuthToulouse School of Economics (GREMAQ, IDEI and Institut universitaire de France), France.
Author
De Donder, PhilippeToulouse School of Economics (GREMAQ-CNRS and IDEI), France.
Author
Maldonado, DarioUniversidad del Rosario, Bogota, Columbia.
Author
Pestieau, PierreCREPP, HEC-Management School University of Liège; CORE, UCL
Author
Abstract
This paper shows that the combination of habit formation – present consumption creating additional consumption needs in the future – and myopia may explain why some retirees are forced to "unretire", i.e., unexpectedly return to work. It also shows that when myopia about habit formation leads to unretirement there is a case for government's intervention. In a first-best setting the optimal solution can be decentralized by a simple "Pigouvian" (paternalistic) consumption tax (along with suitable lump-sum taxes). In a second-best setting, when personalized lump-sum transfers are not available, consumption taxes may have conflicting paternalistic and redistributive effects. We study the design of consumption taxes in such a setting when myopic individuals differ in productivity.