Who turns to acupuncture? The role of mistrust of rationality and individualist success
(2015) Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine : research on paradigm, practice, and policy — Vol. 21, n° 8, p. 466-471 (2015)
Files
Whoturnstoacupuncture-Pre-print.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 419.76 KB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- Objective: In our postmodern society, people tend to abandon conventional medicine for alternative medical systems such as acupuncture. What are the reasons for this defiance regarding modern rationality and individualist success? Who turns to acupuncture? Method: In this study (N = 89), we examined whether world views opposed to the predominance of rationality (i.e. mistrust of science, spirituality, paranormal beliefs) and individualist success or consumerism (i.e. power, achievement, and materialism), typically associated with the postmodern era, might explain this attraction toward acupuncture. Participants were recruited through forums on the internet interested in CAM and completed the questionnaire voluntarily. Results: Attraction to acupuncture related negatively with materialism and achievement as well as positively with spirituality, paranormal beliefs, and mistrust in science. Spirituality, paranormal beliefs, and low achievement were the main predictors of attraction to acupuncture and explained 44% of the variance. The mistrust in science mediated the relationship between spiritual and paranormal beliefs and the attraction toward acupuncture. Low achievement explained the link between low materialism and positive attitudes toward acupuncture. Conclusion: The general mistrust of our rational and individualist modern society is indeed an important predictor of attraction toward acupuncture, besides demographic variables.
- Affiliations
Citations
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V., & Van Pachterbeke, M. (2015). Who turns to acupuncture? The role of mistrust of rationality and individualist success. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine : research on paradigm, practice, and policy, 21(8), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2014.0229 (Original work published 2015)