Artificial Moral Agents, Really?
(2019) Wording Robotics — ISBN: [978-3-030-17973-1], 156 p., published
Files
Hunyadi-ArtificialMoralAgents.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 3.07 MB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- How can we plausibly refer to robots as artificial moral agents? Considering the useful classification of the philosopher of the field of AI James H. Moor,I will argue that the term of artificial moral agent is philosophically illegitimate. My argumentation is developped in three stages: the first stage adresses the actual choice of the ethical principles to be programmed into the machine; the secons stage explores the difficulties inherent in giving these priciples an algorithmic form; and the third focuses on the supreme difficulty arising from the very nature of moral reasoning. This analysis aims at encouraging the research on the concepts of moral reasoning and judgement. Indeed, a fine understanding of these notions should reveal the full extent of the problem with artificial moral agents; before we can discuss machine ethics or artificial ethics, we must, if we are to avoid speculation and ideology, have a clear understanding of what ethics is, what type of rationality it implements, and what is the nature of ethics ans ethical conduct in general.
- Affiliations
Citations
Hunyadi, M. (2019). Artificial Moral Agents, Really? In Jean-Paul Laumond, Emmanuelle Danblon, Céline Pieters (ed.), Wording Robotics (Springer, p. 156 p.). Springer. https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/62642