Noun incorporation vs. nominal composition in a diachronic typological perspective: Evidence from Indo-European and beyond

Kulikov, Leonid
(2020) “Typology of morphosyntactic parameters” (TMP-10) — Location: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Institute of Linguistics (Moscow), Lomonosov Moscow State University (online) (7.October.2020)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
Abstract
This paper deals with diachronic aspects of noun incorporation as a low transitivity phenomenon, concentrating on evidence from Indo-European languages. I determine canonical noun incorporation as a particular productive type of compounding in which a verb (V) and a noun (N) combine to form a new verb. The paper focuses, in particular, on the full verbhood of the V component and of the entire compound altogether, thus distinguishing canonical noun incorporation from nominal compounds based on deverbal nouns. It will be demonstrated that, although noun incorporation is unusual for the Indo-European linguistic type, it can be found in some Germanic languages (in particular, in Frisian) and in late Sanskrit. I will argue that one possible scenario of the emergence of noun incorporation is based on the expansion of nominal composition on the basis of deverbal nouns (i.e. formations outside the verbal paradigm properly speaking) to non-finite forms belonging to the periphery of the paradigm, such as converbs or infinitives. In the event when this compounding is further extended to finite forms, which form the core of the verbal paradigm, we observe the emergence of the full-fledged canonical noun incorporation. This generalization is further corroborated by evidence from some non-Indo-European languages (Quechua, Old Tamil).
Affiliations

Citations

  • APA
  • Chicago
  • FWB

Kulikov, L. (2020). Noun incorporation vs. nominal composition in a diachronic typological perspective: Evidence from Indo-European and beyond. “Typology of morphosyntactic parameters” (TMP-10), Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Institute of Linguistics (Moscow), Lomonosov Moscow State University (online). https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/100025