Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Survival for Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Features Selected According to STAMPEDE Criteria: An EMPaCT Study.

Milonas, Daimantas;Giesen, Alexander;Laenen, Annouschka;Devos, Gaëtan;European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT);et.al.
(2024) European Urology Oncology — Vol. 7, n° 6, p. 1478-1486 (2024)

Files

2024_Milonas_Eur_Urol_Oncol.pdf
  • Restricted Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 1.25 MB

Details

Authors
  • Milonas, Daimantas
    Author
  • Giesen, Alexander
    Author
  • Laenen, Annouschka
    Author
  • Devos, Gaëtan
    Author
  • Author
  • European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)
    Collaborator
Show more
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0-1 versus 2-3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both p < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (p = 0.5), 3.9 (p < 0.0001), and 5.5 (p < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (p = 0.4), 2.2 (p < 0.0001), and 2.5 (p = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.
Affiliations

Citations

Milonas, D., Giesen, A., Laenen, A., Devos, G., Briganti, A., Gontero, P., Karnes, R. J., Chlosta, P., Claessens, F., De Meerleer, G., Everaerts, W., Graefen, M., Marchioro, G., Sanchez-Salas, R., Tombal, B., Van Der Poel, H., Van Poppel, H., Spahn, M., & Joniau, S. (2024). Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Survival for Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Features Selected According to STAMPEDE Criteria: An EMPaCT Study. European Urology Oncology, 7(6), 1478-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.016 (Original work published 2024)