Lesson almost learnt: 1+1 does not equal anticompetitive effects when applying the Intel test in exclusive payments cases (Case T-235/18)Lampecco, Nora(2022) , 2 pages
FilesAnalysis_Lessonalmostlearnt_11doesnotequalanticompetitiveeffectswhenapplyingtheInteltestinexclusivepayments.pdf Open Access Adobe PDF169.17 KBDownloadDetailsAuthorsLampecco, NoraUCLouvainAuthorAbstractAnalysis of the Qualcomm v European Commission judgment(T-235/18) regarding the application of the Intel test in exclusivity payments.Show moreAffiliationsUCLouvainSSH/JURI/PJIE - Droit international et européenShow moreCitations APA Chicago FWB Lampecco, N. (2022). Lesson almost learnt: 1+1 does not equal anticompetitive effects when applying the Intel test in exclusive payments cases (Case T-235/18). https://hdl.handle.net/2078.5/100381