(2016) Science — Vol. 354, n° 6312, p. aaf5239-aaf5239 (2016)
Files
No attached file found for this publication.
Details
Authors
Sinatra, RobertCenter for Complex Network Research and Physics Department, Northeastern University, Boston
Author
Wang, DashunKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
Author
Deville, PierreUCLouvain
Author
Song, ChaomingDepartment of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables
Author
Barabasi, Albert-LászlóCenter for Cancer Systems Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
Author
Abstract
Despite the frequent use of numerous quantitative indicators to gauge the professional impact of a scientist, little is known about how scientific impact emerges and evolves in time. Here, we quantify the changes in impact and productivity throughout a career in science, finding that impact, as measured by influential publications, is distributed randomly within a scientist's sequence of publications. This random-impact rule allows us to formulate a stochastic model that uncouples the effects of productivity, individual ability, and luck and unveils the existence of universal patterns governing the emergence of scientific success.The model assigns a unique individual parameter Q to each scientist, which is stable during a career, and it accurately predicts the evolution of a scientist's impact, from the h-index to cumulative citations, and independent recognitions, such as prizes.
Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aaf5239-aaf5239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239 (Original work published 2016)