Files

A_Unified_Comparison_of_Tabular_and_Graph-Based_Feature_Representations_in_Machine_Learning_for_Malware_Detection.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 865.84 KB

Details

Authors
Abstract
Feature representation is a key factor in machine learning-based malware detection, affecting the information expressed and used for detection, the choice of the classifier, and computational efficiency. While both tabular and graph-based feature representations have been widely studied, we lack a systematic comparison under unified conditions. This study compares tabular and graph-based features extracted through static and dynamic analysis for malware detection. We evaluate these representations using state-of-the-art models on a unified dataset of Windows PE32 files. Our analysis focuses on three aspects: computational time required for feature extraction, detection performance, and robustness against adversarial attacks. To ensure a fair evaluation, we assess detection performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, highlighting the trade-offs between feature complexity, model accuracy, and real-world applicability. We find that tabular features perform best in most scenarios, making the cost of building graphs not always justified.
Affiliations

Citations

Bettaieb, S., Lucca, S., Bertrand Van Ouytsel, C.-H., Riviere, E., & et al. (2025). A Unified Comparison of Tabular and Graph-Based Feature Representations in Machine Learning for Malware Detection. 2025 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW). Published. 4th Workshop on Rethinking Malware Analysis (WoRMA), Venice, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW67616.2025.00012