Game over: empower early career researchers to improve research quality
(2021) Insights : the UKSG Journal — Vol. 34 (2021) (2021)
Files
Empowerearlycareerresearcherstoimproveresearchquality.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 1.86 MB
Details
- Authors
De Herde, Véronique 
Björnmalm, Mattias Susi, Toma
- Abstract
- Processes of research evaluation are coming under increasing scrutiny, with detractors arguing that they have adverse effects on research quality, and that they support a research culture of competition to the detriment of collaboration. Based on three personal perspectives, we consider how current systems of research evaluation lock early career researchers and their supervisors into practices that are deemed necessary to progress academic careers within the current evaluation frameworks. We reflect on the main areas in which changes would enable better research practices to evolve; many align with open science. In particular, we suggest a systemic approach to research evaluation, taking into account its connections to the mechanisms of financial support for the institutions of research and higher education in the broader landscape. We call for more dialogue in the academic world around these issues and believe that empowering early career researchers is key to improving research quality.
- Affiliations
Citations
De Herde, V., Björnmalm, M., & Susi, T. (2021). Game over: empower early career researchers to improve research quality. Insights : the UKSG Journal, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.548 (Original work published 2021)