Histological interpretation of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) remains challenging-observations from a bi-national ring-study.

Dasgupta, Shatavisha;de Jonge, Elf;Van Bockstal, Mieke;Wong-Alcala, Luthy S M;Ewing-Graham, Patricia C;et.al.
(2021) Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology — Vol. 479, n° 2, p. 305-315 (2021)

Files

2021_Dasgupta_Virchows_Arch.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 7.8 MB

Details

Authors
  • Dasgupta, Shatavishaorcid-logo
    Author
  • de Jonge, Elf
    Author
  • Author
  • Wong-Alcala, Luthy S M
    Author
  • Ewing-Graham, Patricia Corcid-logo
    Author
Show more
Abstract
Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a premalignant lesion that is known to progress rapidly to invasive carcinoma. Accurate histological diagnosis is therefore crucial to allow appropriate treatment. To identify reliable diagnostic features, we evaluated the inter-observer agreement in the histological assessment of dVIN, among a bi-national, multi-institutional group of pathologists. Two investigators from Erasmus MC selected 36 hematoxylin-eosin-stained glass slides of dVIN and no-dysplasia, and prepared a list of 15 histological features of dVIN. Nine participating pathologists (i) diagnosed each slide as dVIN or no-dysplasia, (ii) indicated which features they used for the diagnosis, and (iii) rated these features in terms of their diagnostic usefulness. Diagnoses rendered by > 50% participants were taken as the consensus (gold standard). p53-immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for all cases, and the expression patterns were correlated with the consensus diagnoses. Kappa (ĸ)-statistics were computed to measure inter-observer agreements, and concordance of the p53-IHC patterns with the consensus diagnoses. For the diagnosis of dVIN, overall agreement was moderate (ĸ = 0.42), and pair-wise agreements ranged from slight (ĸ = 0.10) to substantial (ĸ = 0.73). Based on the levels of agreement and ratings of usefulness, the most helpful diagnostic features were parakeratosis, cobblestone appearance, chromatin abnormality, angulated nuclei, atypia discernable under × 100, and altered cellular alignment. p53-IHC patterns showed substantial concordance (ĸ = 0.67) with the consensus diagnoses. Histological interpretation of dVIN remains challenging with suboptimal inter-observer agreement. We identified the histological features that may facilitate the diagnosis of dVIN. For cases with a histological suspicion of dVIN, consensus-based pathological evaluation may improve the reliability of the diagnosis.
Affiliations

Citations

Dasgupta, S., de Jonge, E., Van Bockstal, M., Wong-Alcala, L. S. M., Wilhelmus, S., Makkus, L. A. C. F., Schelfout, K., Van de Vijver, K. K., Smits, S., Marbaix, E., Koljenović, S., van Kemenade, F. J., & Ewing-Graham, P. C. (2021). Histological interpretation of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) remains challenging-observations from a bi-national ring-study. Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 479(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03070-0 (Original work published 2021)