Comparison of a commercially available rep-PCR system (Diversilab(R)) with PCR-ribotyping for typing of Clostridium difficile strains.

Eckert, C;Van Broeck, Johan;Spigaglia, P;Burghoffer, B;Barbut, F;et.al.
(2011) Journal of Clinical Microbiology — Vol. 49, n° 9, p. 3352-3354 (2011)

Files

pdfdocument.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 508.05 KB

Details

Authors
  • Eckert, CUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Author
  • Van Broeck, JohanUCLouvain
    Author
  • Spigaglia, PIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
    Author
  • Burghoffer, BUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Author
  • Author
  • Barbut, FUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Author
Show more
Abstract
This study compared a rep-PCR method (DiversiLab® system) to PCR-ribotyping. The discriminatory power of rep-PCR was 0.997. Among the PCR-ribotype 027, different rep-types could be distinguished. Rep-PCR showed a higher discriminatory power than PCR-ribotyping. Nevertheless, this method requires technical skill and visual interpretation of rep-PCR fingerprint patterns may be difficult.
Affiliations

Citations

Eckert, C., Van Broeck, J., Spigaglia, P., Burghoffer, B., Delmée, M., Mastrantonio, P., & Barbut, F. (2011). Comparison of a commercially available rep-PCR system (Diversilab(R)) with PCR-ribotyping for typing of Clostridium difficile strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 49(9), 3352-3354. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00324-11 (Original work published 2011)