The INHALE trial: multiple reasons for a negative result.

Rouby, Jean-Jacques;Monsel, Antoine;Ehrmann, Stephan;Bouglé, Adrien;Laterre, Pierre-François
(2020) The Lancet Infectious Diseases — Vol. 20, n° 7, p. 778-779 (2020)

Files

2020_Rouby_Lancet_Infect_Dis.pdf
  • Open Access
  • Adobe PDF
  • 44.56 KB

Details

Authors
  • Rouby, Jean-Jacques
    Author
  • Monsel, Antoine
    Author
  • Ehrmann, Stephan
    Author
  • Bouglé, Adrien
    Author
  • Laterre, Pierre-FrançoisUCLouvain
    Author
Abstract
The INHALE trial, a Bayer-sponsored phase 3 trial in critically ill patients with pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria by Michael Niederman and colleagues,1 did not find aerosolised amikacin as an adjunctive therapy to intravenous antibiotics to be superior to intravenous antibiotics alone. The study design, the doses of amikacin, and the technique of nebulisation are all likely to explain this negative result. [...]
Affiliations

Citations

Rouby, J.-J., Monsel, A., Ehrmann, S., Bouglé, A., & Laterre, P.-F. (2020). The INHALE trial: multiple reasons for a negative result. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(7), 778-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30481-3 (Original work published 2020)