Itraconazole versus ketoconazole for the prophylaxis of fungal infection in neutropenic children: results of two consecutive nonrandomized studies.

Ninane, J.;Sluysmans, Thierry;Vermylen, Christiane;De Beule, K;Cornu, Guy;et.al.
(1989) Pediatric Hematology & Oncology — Vol. 6, n° 4, p. 349-353 (1989)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
  • Ninane, J.
    Author
  • Author
  • Vermylen, ChristianeUCLouvain
    Author
  • De Beule, K
    Author
  • Cornu, GuyUCLouvain
    Author
Show more
Abstract
Two consecutive nonrandomized studies were conducted in children with prolonged granulocytopenia to evaluate the prophylactic antifungal activity of ketoconazole and the new triazole itraconazole. The conditions were equivalent in both studies. The incidence of colonization was 10% in the ketoconazole group and 19% in the itraconazole group (this difference is not significant). For suspected and proven infections, the incidence was 5% for ketoconazole and 10% for itraconazole, but the incidences were too low for statistical comparison. Although the colonization rate was higher for itraconazole, there was no sign of Aspergillus, whereas in the ketoconazole group an autopsy, proven aspergillosis has been reported.
Affiliations

Citations

Ninane, J., Sluysmans, T., Vermylen, C., De Beule, K., Woestenborghs, R., Cauwenbergh, G., & Cornu, G. (1989). Itraconazole versus ketoconazole for the prophylaxis of fungal infection in neutropenic children: results of two consecutive nonrandomized studies. Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, 6(4), 349-353. https://doi.org/10.3109/08880018909034306 (Original work published 1989)