The mere exposure effect without recognition can depend on the way you look!

Willems, Sylvie;Dedonder, Jonathan;Van der Linden, Martial
(2010) Experimental Psychology — Vol. 57, n° 3, p. 185-192 (2010)

Files

No attached file found for this publication.

Details

Authors
  • Willems, SylvieUliège
    Author
  • Author
  • Van der Linden, MartialUliège
    Author
Abstract
In line with Whittlesea and Price (2001), we investigated whether the memory effect measured with an implicit memory paradigm (mere exposure effect) and an explicit recognition task depended on perceptual processing strategies, regardless of whether the task required intentional retrieval. We found that manipulation intended to prompt functional implicit-explicit dissociation no longer had a differential effect when we induced similar perceptual strategies in both tasks. Indeed, the results showed that prompting a nonanalytic strategy ensured performance above chance on both tasks. Conversely, inducing an analytic strategy drastically decreased both explicit and implicit performance. Furthermore, we noted that the nonanalytic strategy involved less extensive gaze scanning than the analytic strategy and that memory effects under this processing strategy were largely independent of gaze movement.
Affiliations

Citations

Willems, S., Dedonder, J., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). The mere exposure effect without recognition can depend on the way you look! Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000023 (Original work published 2010)