Balancing robustness and adaptation rate for proton therapy of lung cancer patients
(2024) Radiotherapy & Oncology — Vol. 196, p. 110290 [1-6] (2024)
Files
Manuscript_revised_VMB_ES.pdf
Open Access - Adobe PDF
- 1.13 MB
Details
- Authors
- Abstract
- (en) INTRODUCTION: An increase in plan robustness leads to a higher dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), and an increased chance of post-treatment toxicities. In contrast, more conformal plans lead to sparing of healthy surrounding tissue at the expense of a higher sensitivity to anatomical changes, requiring costly adaptations. In this study, we assess the trade-off and impact of treatment plan robustness on the adaptation rate. METHOD: Treatment planning was performed for 40 lung cancer patients, each having a planning 4DCT and up to eight weekly repeated 4DCTs (reCTs). For each patient, plans were made with three different levels of robustness based on setup uncertainty of 3, 6 and 9 mm. These plans were robustly re-evaluated on all reCTs to assess whether the clinical constraints were met. RESULTS: For the 3, 6 and 9 mm robustness levels, adaptation rates of 87.5 %, 70.0 % and 57.5 %, respectively, were observed. A mean absolute normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) gain of 2.9 percentage points (pp) was calculated for pneumonitis grade ≥ 2 when transitioning from 9 mm plans to 3 mm plans, 7.6 pp for esophagitis grade ≥ 2, and 2.5 pp for mortality risk 2 years post-treatment. CONCLUSION: The lowered risk of post treatment toxicities at lower robustness levels is clinically relevant but comes at the expense of more treatment adaptations, particularly in cases where meeting our clinical goals is not compromised by having a dose that is more conformal to the target. The trade-off between workload and reduced NTCP needs to be individually assessed.
- Affiliations
Citations
Badiu, V., Trier Taasti, V., Defraene, G., van Elmpt, W., & Sterpin, E. (2024). Balancing robustness and adaptation rate for proton therapy of lung cancer patients. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 196, 110290 [1-6]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110290 (Original work published 2024)